Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
Actually I agree w/ this ruling. A judge should not be the seperate arbiter of life and death, unless the defendant has waived trial by jury, and had a bench trial. The Constitution gives the right to trial by jury. I see no reason that the death penalty portion of the trial should be difft.

So Ginsburg wrote the opinion. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while

9 posted on 06/24/2002 8:14:48 AM PDT by frmrda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: frmrda
And how comfortable should we be that they are going to hear CFR?
11 posted on 06/24/2002 8:17:46 AM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: frmrda
Actually I agree w/ this ruling. A judge should not be the seperate arbiter of life and death, unless the defendant has waived trial by jury, and had a bench trial. The Constitution gives the right to trial by jury. I see no reason that the death penalty portion of the trial should be difft.

I think it's a state issue, isn't it? I don't think this ruling has much impact in federal cases, since I'm not sure that they allow bench sentencing.

12 posted on 06/24/2002 8:18:06 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson