Posted on 06/23/2002 1:41:09 PM PDT by Valin
Does that mean that Black opposition to slavery is predictable but unjustified?
After all that has happened both on the black and white sides .....Blacks are still slaves in their own minds. and ....Whites[ ALL RACES THROUGH REPERATIONS ] will never be slave owners and yet will still get the bill and blame
Someone told me once there is no such thing as reverse racism i think they were either drunk or stupid maybe both !
At the same time, the Democratic nominee will have a difficult time categorically rejecting the idea, either, as it would cost him heavily with blacks. The Democratic candidate will undoubtedly wish that the topic not be approached.
Bush must not allow that wish to become true. He must push the nominee for an answer. He must be brutal. He must demand an answer on national TV during a debate.
It will be 20 more years before the Cultural Marxists in education and the media will have successfully prepared America for reparations- the time to exploit this issue is now.
Kwame has not proved the necessity of anything. Most blacks thrive and prosper today, as do most whites, orientals, hispanics, etc. What necessity?
(2) look closely at today's conditions that cause continuation of these deplorable circumstances;
The 'delorable circumstance' that Kwame is not getting any guilt money yet? Slavery? (Ended 1865) Jim Crow? (Faded out sometime in the late 60's) For the ambitious, black skin is a positive advantage today in America!
(3) develop a plan that would set up endowments, scholarships and other incentives for increased positive black involvement in American life;
We already have all of these today!
(4) enact laws that are effective and enforceable that would eliminate all acts of discrimination.
No law can possibly eliminate 'all forms' of discrimination, but the laws we have comprise the best legal protection against racial discrimination that has ever existed anywhere, anytime. And the proof of that is the lack of black immigration to Africa or other parts of the world, and the continuing flow of immigrants from all parts of the third world to our shores.
These are just a few ideas for a beginning toward full reparations.
He says 'full reparations', but stated earlier that no amount of money could possibly make up for all the brutality, etc. So what he means is 'unending payments', because the next generation and the next after that will demand their 'fair share' too. There is simply no legal or historical precedent for this sort of guilt claim by one racial group on another. Besides, any money for reparations would be paid by ALL Americans -- white, black, hispanic, recent immigrants, etc. Their case will fall apart in court, if it ever gets that far.
ROTFLMAO!
A democRAT would be screwed either way he turns though. This could be very interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.