Replies

Yep......very poorly handled and especially in areas of extreme importance.

1. Near immediate clearance of adults in around the home that evening
2. Missed shell casing
3. POLAROID, but no 35mm picture of the blood stain on jacket
4. Forensic specialist visiting VD home, discovery spot and autopsy ?????
5. No apparent attention paid to unindentified fingerprint

When added to all the things that don't make sense and the involvement of Diane Halfman, it begins to look as if things are not on the up and up.

I can't imagine why LE wouldn't have done their best to avoid any glaring mistakes in a case like this. There is already such strangeness and questions surrounding it and its high profile status should have caused unprecedented care. Very curious !!!

The real problem with the shell casing information, is the fact that it was brought up by the DEFENSE. The prosecution did not even bring it up.

What else is the prosecution hiding/overlooking/not mentioning/covering-up/mis-managing?

Yep......very poorly handled and especially in areas of extreme importance.

I do not believe this jury will buy "the sloppy way the evidence was handled" defense. The defense will have to explain away every piece of evidence. i.e. eye witness that she did enter the MH at one time and was bleeding. And DW will HAVE to take the stand. And he better not have anything in his background that makes him look like he liked children other than his own.