Skip to comments.
Homeschooling and its foes
The Washington Times ^
| 6/23/2002
| House Editorial
Posted on 06/23/2002 4:22:00 AM PDT by xsysmgr
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
In 1985, JC Penney sold a T-shirt that displayed a rundown trailer on the front; over the picture in sloppily scrawled writing were the words "home-skooled." That same year, five families from Florida were prosecuted for truancy, and one temporarily lost custody of its children. All of that was because these families decided to educate their children at home.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: education; homeschool; homeschoollist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
06/23/2002 4:22:00 AM PDT
by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
In the name of "fairness," public education has produced a system which does a good job of providing politically correct indoctrination about subjects such as condom use, homosexual rights, global warming, etc. But it does a poor job of teaching children basic reading, writing and mathematics skills.
Wonderful so our children know about sex, but lack the basic skills got get a job. Can you say welfare!
To: xsysmgr
JC Penney sold that tee shirt in '85? I thought that just happened a couple of years back.
3
posted on
06/23/2002 4:51:31 AM PDT
by
kassie
To: xsysmgr
The teacher's union, the communists [liberals], and the democrats enjoy your children being raped, robbed, and assualted while atending public schools.
For the most part, their chldren attend private schools.
The reason that the democrat politicans oppose vouchers for all children to attend private schools is that they do not want thir children rubbing shoulders with poor blacks, hispanics, and poor white children.
It is perfectly ok to use these same children to further their political agenda.
There may be other reasons, but they are secondary to paragaph 2.
4
posted on
06/23/2002 4:54:17 AM PDT
by
sport
To: 2Jedismom
ping
5
posted on
06/23/2002 4:57:24 AM PDT
by
TxBec
To: xsysmgr
And yet students from foreign nations without diplomas from
a state institution can readily get into any college with
financial aid -- what a goofy bureaumaniac country
we live in -- the People's Republic on the Potomac.
6
posted on
06/23/2002 5:05:08 AM PDT
by
Woodkirk
To: TxBec
The government is under no obligation to provide taxpayer funded services to home schoolers but by the same standard the government shouldn't place obstacles in front of parents wishing to educate their children at home. Either the government accords home schools a place in our nation's education system or it compensates them for whatever governmental roadblocks are erected to retard and frustrate their growth and development. If its the latter, fighting home schooling can get expensive for the government pretty quickly. The bottom line is that whether the government likes it or not, home schools are here to stay.
To: xsysmgr
"
In Texas, Baylor University formally accepted six students, only to deny them admission after realizing that they were home-schooled."
Undoubtably because the six home schooled students had not been "indoctrinated" by state run schools and posed a risk to those that were.
8
posted on
06/23/2002 5:45:21 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
To: goldstategop
Homeschooling is the biggest threat to government education because it empowers the individual and is not limited to a single interest group.
9
posted on
06/23/2002 5:51:31 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: Woodkirk
Foreign students (on student visas) are
ineligible for U.S. gov. assistance.
This is why universities love foreign students.
The must pay cash.
If a stat Univ. they recieve no resident discount and
pay an increased rate.
Foreign students are a good source of income.
To: G.Mason
so much for creating a diverse first year class....
To: kassie
I would bet the ranch it was about 95.
12
posted on
06/23/2002 6:28:44 AM PDT
by
mlmr
To: *Homeschool_list; madfly
To: G.Mason
"In Texas, Baylor University formally accepted six students, only to deny them admission after realizing that they were home-schooled." Undoubtably because the six home schooled students had not been "indoctrinated" by state run schools and posed a risk to those that were.
Or because they believed more strongly in God and in His Word than did the Baylor administration.
To: G.Mason
I would think that the home-schooled students would have a cut and dried law suit against Baylor. If they go after Baylor and get the right jury they might end up owning the University.
15
posted on
06/23/2002 6:53:25 AM PDT
by
gaspar
To: xsysmgr
When the top government official tells bald-face lies to the American public, ala Bill Clinton saying, "I didn't inhale" and "I didn't have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinski" and defaults to banality before the court saying "it depends on what the meaning of is, is," that is not an institution you want teaching your children. It's a glaring example of why government was never given constitutional power to conduct public education schooling. And especially not setting the curriculum.
That government usurped the citizens power to teach children further proves that government can be detrimental to your child and his or her education.
People are not stupid; given equal time to hear both sides of virtually any issue they have good judgjement. There's a saying in the lawyer field. "If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If you've got the law on your side pound on the law. If you've got neither, pound on the table."
The effectiveness of pounding on the table has been in rapid decline as a means of winning arguments. Even pounding on the law is losing it's luster. Contrastive, in-context facts are soaring in credibility with people.
Imagine what would happen if John Stossel got not five minutes air time each week but got five hours.
16
posted on
06/23/2002 7:05:35 AM PDT
by
Zon
To: Zon
17
posted on
06/23/2002 7:13:18 AM PDT
by
ladylib
To: ladylib
The grand delusion of virtually any person pushing an agenda that doesn't have full honesty of in context facts on their side is that they've deluded themselves to believe that their pounding on something other than the complete facts is a winning proposition, when in fact it's just the opposite.
18
posted on
06/23/2002 7:33:48 AM PDT
by
Zon
To: xsysmgr
Ef I hud been hume skulled i wuld be a butter speuller..hahahahaha.
To: goldstategop
The government is under no obligation to provide taxpayer funded services to home schoolersOnly if homeschoolers got a rebate on taxes they paid to the gov't schools, which they do not.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson