Posted on 06/22/2002 10:45:05 PM PDT by Reagan is King
ABCNEWS.com Poll Finds Most Support Individuals' Right to Own Guns
Americans overwhelmingly agree with the Justice Department's new position that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of citizens to own guns. But most also favor some restrictions on that right
After hearing the Second Amendment verbatim, 73 percent in an ABCNEWS.com poll said it guarantees the right to individual gun ownership. Twenty percent said, instead, that it only guarantees the right of states to maintain militias the government's longstanding position until the Justice Department reversed it in a U.S. Supreme Court brief last week.
This poll is from last month but I searched under several terms and couldn't find this already posted. It looks like the anti-gun lobby is continuing to lose ground.
America: It's Our
Right to Bear Arms ABCNEWS.com Poll Finds Most
Support Individuals' Right to Own Guns Analysis By Daniel Merkle May 14 Americans overwhelmingly agree with the Justice Department's new position that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of citizens to own guns. But most also favor some restrictions on that right.
|
After hearing the Second Amendment verbatim, 73 percent in an ABCNEWS.com poll said it guarantees the right to individual gun ownership. Twenty percent said, instead, that it only guarantees the right of states to maintain militias the government's longstanding position until the Justice Department reversed it in a U.S. Supreme Court brief last week.
Previous polling by ABCNEWS has found that larger majorities support specific measures such as background checks at gun shows, mandatory trigger locks, handgun registration, banning assault weapons and licensing handgun owners. But nearly six in 10 have opposed a nationwide ban on the sale of handguns, except to law enforcement officers. Gun control hasn't ranked as a top-tier issue. Few think new laws would substantially reduce violent crime, or would be more effective than better enforcement of current laws.
Tighter Controls Favored Support for stricter gun control rises to just under seven in 10 women, Democrats, nonwhites, and Northeasterners. It even reaches a slim majority, 51 percent, of those who say the Second Amendment guarantees gun ownership. Large majorities in all demographic groups agree with the Justice Department's new view on gun rights, peaking among men, whites, Republicans and residents of the South and Midwest. Even 65 percent of those who support tougher gun laws agree, as do 66 percent of women and Democrats. The government's new position states that the Second Amendment "more broadly protects the rights of individuals, including persons who are not members of any militia or engage in active service or training, to possess and bear their own firearms, subject to reasonable restrictions designed to prevent possession by unfit persons or to restrict the possession of types of firearms that are particularly suited to criminal use." The amendment itself states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Methodology This ABCNEWS.com survey was conducted by telephone May 8-12, among a random national sample of 1,028 adults. The results have a three-point error margin. Sampling, data collection and tabulation was conducted by TNS Intersearch of Horsham, Pa. |
Common Law is very strong, a history of a commonly held belief by citizens of a society, who have held through their history a common thought on the legality of a matter.
This is the best way I can define it without a dictionary.
Is that what was ratified as Article II of the Amendments to the Constitution?
The Second Amendment to the Constitution was ratified with but a single coma and appeared thusly; "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
It is important when referencing the Second Amendment to use it in its clear and flawless original form. The gratuitous addition of commas serves only to render the sentence grammatically incorrect and unnecessarily ambiguous.
I think "being necessary to the security of a free state" is parenthetical either way, so the meaning should be no different.
For the most part, I agree.
Consider the following:
A well regulated Internet being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Modems shall not be infringed.
Or
A well regulated universe being necessary for the sun to rise each morning, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Or
A well regulated carpenter being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear hammers shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment clearly indicates that in order for a State to be able to raise a militia the government must not interfere with the individual citizens inherent right to gun ownership. Which State supports the notion of raising a well-regulated militia made up of their unarmed citizens? Remember, a single armed individual can be a militia
A well-informed electorate being necessary to the continuance of a free state, the right of the people to keep and disseminate literature shall not be infringed.
Naturally this means only the electoral college can vote, and it doesn't protect semi-automatic printing presses, radio and TV or the Internet ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.