Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
Demidog wrote: You read it too. What "special" rights are we talking about?

You read every word I posted and I never said Goldwater advocated "special" rights for gays.

But he advocated gays in the military, something that most knowledgable people agree is detrimental to discipline and good order.

That alone militates against Goldwater being a conservative during his later life.

Goldwater morphed into a liberal libertarian, why don't you just admit it and move on?

896 posted on 06/22/2002 9:51:34 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
But he advocated gays in the military, something that most knowledgable people agree is detrimental to discipline and good order.

Right. That's why the military is doing so poorly in Afghanistan then eh? So many gays? Do you ever even think about your absurd propositions? If "most knowledgable" people agreed, then there would be no controversy at all.

There is, and that is because "most knowledgable people" in fact DO NOT agree.

Goldwater rightly stated that one's sexuality was not a relevant test of one's ability to do well in battle: "You don't have to be straight to be good in battle, you have to SHOOT straight."

He was correct.

932 posted on 06/22/2002 10:11:21 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson