[Roscoe]

It's still a division of the Department of Labor (an executive agency), reporting to the head of the executive branch.

With the responsibilty of applying the laws enacted by Congress.

If you have a legal basis for judicial review of the OSHA activities at issue, say what it is.

If you have a law or case precedent that allows a President to order regulatory interpretations by decree, cite it.

[toenail]

This'll be the end of my comments on this post. There is no "interpretation" to, for instance, regulations against reusing unsterilized instruments between medical procedures. There is, however, a long history of unenforcement of these regulations when they concern abortion clinics, since abortion clinics are staffed and run by medical washouts whose costs would curtail their population control activities if they had to abide (in reality) with the same regulations that reputable medical facilities do. There is nothing written that precludes them from enforcement; there is only the wink-wink unenforcement and ensuing claptrap apologetics of those who want to give abortion clinics free reign.