OK, I get it, Both you and Laz are mind readers now, Way too much reading between the lines around here. I guess I'm supposed to apologize to Registered because his graphics are being used by the RATS?
OK, I get it, Both you and Laz are mind readers now,No, I am not reading minds. But I am asking you if you would distance yourself from the implication, that because Registered's graphics are showing up at DU, is that he shares viewpoints in common with people at DU?
You have not distanced yourself from that implication. If you fail to, the reader can only be left with the conclusion that your intent was, in fact, to smear Registered.
How about taking this occasion and renouncing any false associations that you may have inadvertantly made?
OK, I get it, Both you and Laz are mind readers now, Way too much reading between the lines around here.
No, word readers. Your words have meaning. If you didn't mean what your words say, say so and then say what you mean.
If I'm reading between the llines though, I'd guess that you're against attempts at mind reading. Or are you...?
I guess I'm supposed to apologize to Registered because his graphics are being used by the RATS?
Ah, that would be a "no" to your attempt at a straw man fallacy.
But I don't really mind... If you owe anyone an apology, it's because of your earlier attempt at a guilt-by-association fallacy.
