[Roscoe]

"Well the question was who's fault was it that the voters elected Clinton twice? And I repeat, I have no idea, but I hope we're smart enough not to let it happen again. But somehow I doubt that some of the third party people posting on this thread care much one way or the other."
--Jim Robinson

"This continuous game of Bushbot whack-a-mole is ruining your website."
--OWK

Thanks for proving his point.

[OWK]

Thanks for proving his point.

Thanks for kissing his ass.

[tpaine]

"Well the question was who's fault was it that the voters elected Clinton twice? And I repeat, I have no idea, but I hope we're smart enough not to let it happen again.

But somehow I doubt that some of the third party people posting on this thread care much one way or the other."
--Jim Robinson

---

Isn't the best way to handle dissenting opinion, to rebutt it rather than to silence it?
Or is it possible that some of the dissenting opinion makes people a bit too uncomfortable about their own opinions, and therefore you yeild to calls for the delete button for nothing more than strongly held and expressed dissent?
The Jim I used to know, wasn't afraid to defend his views, and he expected others to do likewise.
This continuous game of Bushbot whack-a-mole is ruining your website.
1270 by OWK

---

Thanks for proving his point.
1274 - roscoe

---

--- As usual roseco, you are confused.
OWK was commenting on JR's second comment/sentence of the above. - And the fact that he then silenced the respondent.

--- If you're gonna take on the domOrgan role here at FR, please try to at least keep up on who is making what point.