Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goody2shooz
Here's something to consider about vaccinating the whole population of the USA against Smallpox. The population was determined in 2001 to be 284,796,887. Because Smallpox vaccination only guarantees immunity for five years and ten at the most, then the vast majority of the population would have to be vaccinated.

There is a definite measurable risk from Smallpox vaccination. The risk of death is currently 1 per million for primary vaccinees and 0.1 per million for re-vaccinees. For children under 1 year of age the risk of death is 5 per million.

Among primary vaccinees, the combined incidence of postvaccinal encephalitis and vaccinia necrosum is 3.8 per million in persons of all ages. In re-vaccinees these two complications occur at a rate of 0.7 per million. Severe complications of vaccination occur in people who are immunodeficient, immunosuppressed, haematological, suffering other malignancies or pregnant. Source of my information: 'Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg's Medical Microbiology' 20th Edition. Editors: G. F. Brooks, J. S. Butel and L. N. Ornston. Published in 1995.

Therefore, I estimate around 750 serious illnesses (some will cause permanent disabilities or brain damage) and about 170 deaths due to Smallpox vaccination of the applicable portion of the entire population. Now, obviously, that is a much lower number of deaths than might occur if Smallpox was actually used in an attack. However, we would look like idiots if we vaccinated everyone and lost that number of people, and then all the worries about Smallpox being possessed by al-Qaeda turned out to be media hype.

You are right that impressive quarantine methods would be needed to control the spread of a smallpox epidemic after an attack. It would be a very difficult and desperate situation to seal off a major city like New York, or more than one city, and confine people to their homes until they are vaccinated. However, if we vaccinated everyone just in case there is a Smallpox attack, which never materialised, then the hundreds of serious illnesses and deaths that would result would be a further victory for the terrorists. The decision whether or not to perform mass vaccination in the current climate is a dilemma.

I think that Smallpox vaccination should be available to those who want it and that if evidence of a biological attack in preparation comes to light then a mass vaccination program should be begun. However, you can protect yourself from the Smallpox epidemic subsequent to a biological attack by laying up supplies of food and other essentials and getting an appropriate gas mask and coveralls to use when you have to leave your home. Also turn off shared air conditioning systems if you live in an apartment building. These precautions would protect you from exposure to the virus until you are vaccinated and have developed immunity.

3 posted on 06/22/2002 1:28:10 PM PDT by David_H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper
Here is a quote regarding aftercare for successful Smallpox vaccination from: 'Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg's Medical Microbiology' 20th Edition. Editors: G. F. Brooks, J. S. Butel and L. N. Ornston. Published in 1995.

'1. Primary take - In the fully susceptible person, a papule surrounded by hyperemia appears on the third or fourth day. The papule increases in size until vesiculation appears (on the fifth or sixth day). The vesicle reaches its maximum size by the ninth day and then becomes pustular, usually with some tenderness of the axillary nodes. Dessication follows and is complete in about 2 weeks, leaving a depressed pink scar that ultimately turns white. The reading of the result is usually done on the seventh day. If this reaction is not observed, vaccination chould be repeated.

2. Revaccination - A successful revaccination shows in 6-8 days a vesicular or pustular lesion or an area of palpable induration surrounding a central lesion, which may be a scab or an ulcer. Only this reaction indicates with certainty that viral multiplication has taken place. Equivocal reactions may represent immunity but may also represent merely allergic reactions to a vaccine that has become inactivated. When an equivocal reaction occurs, the revaccination should be repeated using a new lot of vaccine known to give "takes" in other persons.'

This quote was from an American medical textbook, so it should be referring to reactions commonly seen in American vaccinees using American Smallpox vaccine.

Best regards

David

5 posted on 06/22/2002 1:47:25 PM PDT by David_H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: David_H
"However, we would look like idiots if we vaccinated everyone and lost that number of people, and then all the worries about Smallpox being possessed by al-Qaeda turned out to be media hype."

David_H...better to look like idiots with virtually the entire population surviving than to look like idiots with half or more of the population dead because we listened to the recommendations of some CDC "panel of experts"...doncha think??

If general innoculation is performed prior to any attack, this will either (1) preempt any attack, or (2)if the "islamic martyrs" are stupid enough to attack anyway, the impact will be extremely minimal. I strongly favor massive voluntary innoculation ASAP.

6 posted on 06/30/2002 8:46:24 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson