To: Rodney King
"Under magnification, they seem to have some sort of molecular structure," she said. Everything larger than an element has a molecular structure.
4 posted on
06/21/2002 10:13:36 AM PDT by
MistrX
To: MistrX
Thanks, that's what I thought.
To: MistrX
Dang, you beat me to the obvious...
To: MistrX
"Under magnification, they seem to have some sort of molecular structure," Furthermore, anything larger than an element has molecular structure whether or not it is under magnification. Heisenberg wasn't THAT uncertain. He limited himself to atoms.
Of course a philosopher would raise a variation on the cliche' tree/forest/makes a sound question "if something is larger than an atom, and nobody views it under magnification, does it have a molecular structure?"
To: MistrX
Beat me, and everyone else, to it.
'It's look like some sort of...thing...'
Thank you doctor!
26 posted on
06/21/2002 10:53:45 AM PDT by
Jn316
To: MistrX
"Everything larger than an element has a molecular structure"
WRONG?
A politician's backbone has no structure whatsoever.
34 posted on
06/21/2002 5:27:48 PM PDT by
APBaer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson