Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: honway
But Hicks said the Port Authority, which owned the building, did its own sprinkler work, and that any other work involving sprinklers would have been arranged by an individual tenant.

If you were a building owner, would you allow your tenants to modify the fire sprinklers? If not, how did they get entry into the building's mechanical areas? Building Security would have had to let them in and they would have called for authorization. Sorry, all of that sounds VERY fishy.

88 posted on 06/21/2002 3:32:13 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
If you were a building owner, would you allow your tenants to modify the fire sprinklers?

Bingo. The sprinkler system is an integrated system;therefore, it is unlikely a single tenant could bring in un-licensed plumbers from a company in business for less than 18 months that was not listed in the phone book to work on a system critical to the safety of the entire tower.

91 posted on 06/21/2002 3:38:47 PM PDT by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson