Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Knitebane
Ten years ago the cost of a copy of Windows was about $100 retail. The cost today? The cheapest that I have found a full copy of any supported version of Windows is around $120. Now I'm sure that the price is lower in large quantities, but that was true then too.

Hey, that's a good deal.

Next time, try adjusting for inflation. If, in 1992, the price for Windows 3.1 was $100, that's $127.80 in 2002 dollars, according to the trusty inflation calculator. So, in reality, the price of Windows has dropped in real terms - $120 today is $93.90 in 1992 dollars. That's almost 10% cheaper than it used to be.

47 posted on 06/21/2002 8:38:10 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
Anybody ever heard the story of the original, the REAL "Internet Explorer"?

My industry brother tells me that the original piece of internet software was developed and owned by a little Chicago company known as early as '87 or '88 as "Internet Explorer." It was a good product and the name had been originally and duly registered by this mom and pop size outfit.

When it came time for Microsoft to crank its attention, its hoary siege cannon in that little company's direction, Gates decided he liked the name almost as much as he hated the useability and high quality of the little company's sole product -- which was designed as a browser first and a massive venue for advertising second.

So, in the style of the good old robber barons, (who, like Gates always traveled with bodyguards, for obvious reasons) Gates simply decided to call his new browser, get ready, "Internet Explorer," what else? He's Bill Gates, he gets to do this kind of thing.

When this small company had finally finished trying to defend itself from the life crushing and business ruining bohemoth by bringing suit in court, after some four or five years appeals, counter appeals, counter double-whammy counter suits, etc. etc., they discovered that they had, after legal fees and the confusion of Gates grabbing the market by using their name, more massive counter-suits by Gates, etc. --these guys discovered they had exactly enough money left over to pay a small severance package to their forty or so employees and turn out the lights. And of course turn out the lights on their now re-mortgaged and re-possessed homes, etc.

If Gates really were a hard-charging, brilliant young whiz-kid entrepreneur, as his hugely expensive self-imaging job has claimed over the years, he would have been too busy designing and building a better browser using its own, and not another guy's, name. But that's not how he operates.

His first step was typical of how he proceeded afterward, he sold DOS before he owned it himself. He did not write the language, he simply gave it a name.

The guy is really really smart, in the same way that a virus is really smart. It tricks the body's own cells into replecating not themselves, but the virus. He's a genius.

And if I were to find out that he is a member of the Church of Scientology, I would not be surprised.

Now THAT would be a wonderful and entertaining face-off. Gates vs. the "Church" of Scientology. Battle of the Reptiles or what?

Have a nice Libertarian Dream of a day, everybody...

48 posted on 06/21/2002 9:18:25 AM PDT by maturin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson