What? The $15 - $25 the OEM computer manufacturer pays to Microsoft for Windows? That is hardly a "monopoly" price.
The flaw in that reasoning is that even if he installed Linux or another OS, he still would have been paying for the Windows license. On the other hand, there have always been manufacturers selling PCs with no OS installed. On the third hand, no major OEM would dare to do this, since they fear retaliation by Microsoft.
Idiots
Out
Walking
Around.
There's a reason I left in 1978 and never looked back as I crossed the Mississippi river into Illinois. In fact, I tore the rear view mirror off the windshield so I wouldn't see it at all!
Attention Microsoft: Stop selling Windows in Iowa, and threaten to prosecute ANYONE who runs an Illegal Windows OS in that state, and watch what happens.
Given the dollar amounts quoted here, why wasn't the original suit filed in small claims court? How did it get class-action status?
Or was it filed as a class-action suit at the beginning? If so, which law firm(s) is really looking for a payday?
Or... are consumers and lawfirms just latching on to the state attorneys general suits like remoras on sharks?
a confused balrog
Hes asking us to morally condemn Microsoft for having the audacity to actually take his money when he willingly offered it to them. And the Iowa Supreme Court sees nothing wrong with thisafter all, if Microsoft was willing to allow Joe Comes to buy their monopoly priced software, who knows what the company will do tomorrow, they could be selling you software that you might want. And then the vicious cycle of supply-and-demand will spin completely out of control.
OUCH!
Crime against humanity. LOL. The ICC is going to have a very fun future.