Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Try answering a couple of simple questions okay?

If the DOJ was not providing lawyers free of charge to Hillary, who would have to hire an attorney, Hillary or the office of the first lady?

If the plaintiff in this case prevails, and is awarded damages, who will have to pay the damages, Hillary or the office of the first lady?

Both of these are simple questions and require only simple responses. I will even help you with the answers. The answers will be either Hillary or the office of the first lady.

324 posted on 06/21/2002 11:32:50 AM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: gunshy
The DOJ has determined that it's in the interest of the United States government to provide an attorney in this case. Now, why would they do that if this were purely Hillary Clinton's problem?

You ought to stop trying to paint this as some personal favor the President is doing for Hillary Clinton. You have no evidence of that, and spreading your ideas that have no foundation is beyond irresponsible.

349 posted on 06/21/2002 12:46:51 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson