In the general public view Clinton was supposedly a good guy. In general public view, Jane Reno was supposedly a good guy (no pun intended). In general public view the FBI is supposedly a good guy agency. In general public view Judicial Watch is supposedly a good guy watch dog. Does Judicial Watch trust the FBI?
Talk is cheap. Do they walk the talk. Actions speak much louder than words.
Has Judicial Watch gotten anything to stick on either of the Clintons? If yes, was it trivial, moderate or big time? I know there was no big case won by Judicial Watch but what about smaller ones won against either Clinton?
Klayman's actions to bring justice against the Clintons has so far been circumvented in one way or the other by the Bush DOJ. If these are/were just witch hunts the DOJ would not get involved. Unless or until the DOJ gets out of the way Klayman's efforts will be futile. I heard Bill O'Rielly say today that the Dems told Bush if he pursues any legal action against the Clintons thus embarrassing the Dems that they will halt any policy he trys to implament and that his presidency would be essentially over. Obviously Bush bought it.