Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN
judicialwatch ^ | 6/22/2002 | For Immediate Release

Posted on 06/20/2002 3:33:10 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN

Storage Facility Raided, Clinton Photographs and Documents Seized

Search Warrant Sought Documents Related to Hillary’s Campaign For Senate, Hollywood Tribute To Bill Clinton, Hillary’s Campaign Finance Director Also Targeted

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported that the FBI seized documents relating to Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the U.S. Senate. The documents were seized in a May 30 raid of a California storage facility containing documents of Peter Paul, the entrepreneur who funded Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign with over $2 million dollars in direct, in-kind contributions which were never reported by Hillary Clinton or her Senate campaign, as required by law. Mr. Paul's money funded the August, 2000 production of “The Hollywood Gala Farewell Tribute To President Clinton,” which featured many Hollywood stars. Mr. Paul’s support for the event was also publicly denied by Mrs. Clinton in The Washington Post and in a debate with then opponent Rick Lazio. The government is seeking the cooperation of Mr. Paul, who is in a Brazilian prison pursuant to an U.S. extradition request on alleged stock and bank fraud. Mr. Paul has already provided evidence to Justice Department investigators in Brazil about the criminal activity of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Mr. Paul told the Department of Justice about the documents and storage facility ten months ago, and had provided them with documentation (checks, videos, financial statements) of his work for the Clintons in early 2001. Mr. Paul donated the over $2 million to the Clinton campaign as part of a $17 million offer to Bill Clinton to work with him after he left the Oval Office.

The search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of the storage facility specifically references the Clintons and the New York Senate campaign. The search warrant authorizes the seizure of:

Records relating to New York Senate 2000, the Hollywood Gala Salute to President William Jefferson Clinton, the Federal Election Commission, David Rosen and Aaron Tonken...

(David Rosen was the Director of Finance for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign, and Aaron Tonken is a Democrat fundraiser who raised money for the Clintons. Both men have knowledge of Mr. Paul’s contributions.

)

“Mr. Paul could have turned the documents about the Clintons over to the FBI months ago under a cooperation agreement. Instead, he waits in a Brazilian dungeon for the Ashcroft Justice Department to get serious about this corruption case. So it is a welcome sign that the Justice Department is turning up the heat on this new crime scandal concerning the Clintons,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

Attorney General John Ashcroft received 59,535 petitions late last year from Judicial Watch supporters protesting Mr. Paul’s disparate treatment and demanding full justice against the Clintons in this new scandal.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: New York
KEYWORDS: biaaaaatch; catholiclist; clinton; clintonscandals; criminal; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-509 next last
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Now wonder these two guys find it so easy to have their lies swallowed

I can read and spell, how about you?
281 posted on 06/21/2002 9:22:27 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I can't stand anymore-- Please direct yourself to FiJC's post #212. Can you name a faintly legitimate reason that anyone's motherhood should be brought up, muchless as regards Howlin? I can't. It's pathetic. (Also note the reply in #214.) Sheesh!!!
282 posted on 06/21/2002 9:45:21 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Clara, I did not find a post where FIJC ever mentioned Howlin's son, that's why I looked for a post that may have been pulled. However, FIJC did elude to Howlin being a mother, this after discussing the advice that Howlin had been giving to her about via FReepmail. In fact, Howlin specifically mentioned her son, not FIJC. The way I took it is that FIJC was making the observation that a mother should understand how to be more tactful when dispensing advice. Maybe you took it differently?
283 posted on 06/21/2002 9:58:14 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
It does not surprise me one bit that the Bush administration has been paying for Hillary's defense. That is the true reality. It is not a Republican thing or a Democratic thing anymore; its a thing called TREASON against the United States of American and the citizens.
284 posted on 06/21/2002 10:11:58 AM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

I'm not sure who is the keeper of that cool tool... the "RANDOM CAPS INITIATOR" .... But maybe they'll share it with others...

285 posted on 06/21/2002 10:12:57 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Clara, I did not find a post where FIJC ever mentioned Howlin's son, that's why I looked for a post that may have been pulled. However, FIJC did elude to Howlin being a mother, this after discussing the advice that Howlin had been giving to her about via FReepmail. In fact, Howlin specifically mentioned her son, not FIJC. The way I took it is that FIJC was making the observation that a mother should understand how to be more tactful when dispensing advice. Maybe you took it differently?
I knew, I knew it...there is none so blind as he who will not see.
286 posted on 06/21/2002 10:16:20 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The 93 U.S. attorneys serve at the PLEASURE OF THE PRESIDENT; they are NOT civil servants. The attorneys are REQUIRED BY LAW to submit their resignations at the beginning of each new administration, when they may be accepted or rejected.

Are you saying that U.S. Attorney John Ashcroft serves the interest of Bush rather than the interest of the people of the United States? What oath does Ashcroft swear to uphold? Where does one get a hold of the oaths of office of such elected officals like him?

As for the other officials who are public servants, who are these officials specifically?

287 posted on 06/21/2002 10:18:07 AM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Yep, you're right on the money, Quix. He lets us go our own way for just so long then the rug gets pulled out from under us and we need to either repent or run. Can't run far since He's omnipresent. People like the Clintons, whom I really do pray for (although sometimes reluctantly, I must confess) do pay for their iniquities at some point. I just wish it were sooner rather than later so they don't do any more damage to our nation. Oh well, I'm certainly not in control here, God is. Too bad, I'd have wiped them off the face of the earth a long time ago but He is patient and willing that no one should perish. He knows the plan better than I do!
288 posted on 06/21/2002 10:19:07 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Good question!
289 posted on 06/21/2002 10:20:27 AM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
It appears Clara, that you read only a few posts. It's plain to see.
290 posted on 06/21/2002 10:20:29 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: tall_tex
Hill has two, Tom. The other one's named Bill.
291 posted on 06/21/2002 10:20:54 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
BTW, answer me this, where did I go wrong on what took place?
292 posted on 06/21/2002 10:21:06 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yes, you can fire career civil servants. You can also sue (as you address those serving at the pleasure of the President) in their personal capacities. They can be sued personally.
293 posted on 06/21/2002 10:23:51 AM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Well, he's at least publicizing it, whichis probably more than the FBI would do...
294 posted on 06/21/2002 10:27:38 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
I knew, I knew it...there is none so blind as he who will not see.

That's the truth.

Maybe it would help some people understand this if they knew that this is not the first time a cruel remark has been made to Howlin about her parenting skills by the poster in question - who, by the way, is fully aware of the circumstances.

Maybe it will finally sink in with those who are having so much difficulty comprehending all this.

295 posted on 06/21/2002 10:28:51 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Admin Moderator
Registered, this has been explained to you on the forum and by FReepmail. The death of someone's child, and someone harassing them about it, is not a joking matter. Go bother someone else about something else on some other thread.

AM, I'll be glad to send you a copy of the FReepmail I sent Registered if you need it.
296 posted on 06/21/2002 10:33:08 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
Apparently you are unaware of the diffeences between federal employees. There are two categories:

1.) Those who are appointed by the President and change as each administration changes. These are all cabinet members, high level cabinet employees (such as Wolfowitz, the Assistant Sec. of Defense) and federal D.A.'s. They serve at "the pleasure of the President" which is the legal phrase indicating they can be fired if the President doesn't like what they are doing, if they undermine the administration, or if they cause a scandal.

2.) Civil service employees, aka "career employees" are not politically appointed. Their jobs are secure and do not depend on who is in the White House. These are the lower level people at State, Defense, Justice, and all other cabinet departments. They can only be fired if they are caught in obvious infractions, like stealing government property. Even then, it is burdensome to make the case against them, because they are all members of the government employees union.

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

297 posted on 06/21/2002 10:34:18 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
...and the amazing fact is...some people will actually be surprised by this information...
298 posted on 06/21/2002 10:35:57 AM PDT by Khurkris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altair
I may be wrong here, but hasn't Bush tried to get judges and justices through the Congress and hasn't been able to do that? Or are these just appointees from the President who don't need to go through the Senate?
299 posted on 06/21/2002 10:44:41 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

Comment #300 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson