Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Why do I have to explain this article. It is there in black and white.

In as much as some of you doubt what is being said in the first sentence there are as many who believe that BUSH will VETO this bill because of the authorization to fund Concurrent Receipt for Retired Disabled Vets.

I voted for BUSH, I've met him and talked to him, he's a nice guy, but for the life of me I haven't seen one initiative from him or his administration for Veterans much less Retired Disabled Veterans. If you know of one please let me know what it is.

As far as pointing out what he's done for AIDS, poor Housing, illegal aliens,foriegn aid and the PLO it is a matter of public record.

American Veterans are the Forgotten Patrol of the Bush Administration.

I urge you to research this website to learn more about this subject USDR.Org

And I'm not a member of USDR

46 posted on 06/20/2002 12:07:52 PM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Militiaman7
Some constructive criticism:

People would take you more seriously if you did not accuse Bush directly when the article makes clear it was the WH Budget Office that made the statement. Your time would be better spent urging other Freepers to contact President Bush asking him not to veto this. Here is a link to a contact list at the White House to get you started. White House Contacts List

You need to change the title to something like "WH Budget Office Advises Bush to Veto Pay for Disabled Vets" and put it up as an action alert. Good luck.

48 posted on 06/20/2002 1:44:19 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson