Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lavaroise
I can understand people getting emotional over this issue, but the intentional misleading, IMHO, by the original poster of this thread is way over the top.
14 posted on 06/20/2002 2:35:27 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
I would say it is closer to the mark than you realize. You have to understand - and it has been said time and time again in this forum - that one of Bush's top qualities in his selections is LOYALTY. As such, the his top advisors invariably have his mindset a mutual understanding of Bush's policy. If his top advisors are recommending to toss this support for disabled vets, then it is VERY LIKELY Bush himself wants to veto it.
33 posted on 06/20/2002 8:20:50 AM PDT by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson