To: All
Could they tell by the size of the prints whether they were made by an adult or a child?
70 posted on
06/19/2002 10:00:58 PM PDT by
mommya
To: mommya
That's how he ruled out DW as making the lower bannister print...no whirl and wrong size.
76 posted on
06/19/2002 10:04:03 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: All
About Danielle's print in the RV - didn't the fingerprint guy testify that this print was very strong - that they lifted the print twice and it was still visible to the naked eye? Wouldn't that indicate that it was something more than her just touching that spot with a fairly clean dry hand? Seems like it must have been that her hand was wet or sticky with some substance - sure would be nice to know what that substance is - say some bodily fluid - or juicy lube - or whatever - it would be a great clue. Do you think they tried to find out? Would it be too late to do so now - after it's been blackened with powder and lifted twice?
82 posted on
06/19/2002 10:09:58 PM PDT by
mommya
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson