Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Space Wrangler
The routine cleanup after camping may be explainable. How about Danielle's prints and blood and hair in the MH? I know the theory that she may have gotten in the MH at some remote time (Dec. or earlier it would have to be), but so far no evidence to show she was ever in it. That will have to wait for the defense case, so too early to conclude.
341 posted on 06/20/2002 12:01:10 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
By "ever in it." I meant "ever in it to play". She obviously was in it at some point.
343 posted on 06/20/2002 12:04:50 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
Yes, the DNA is something I can sink my teeth into. Now they are getting into areas that are black and white. The DNA on the jacket could be the clencher. There are still many, many un-answered questions. I know truth is often stranger than fiction, but how in the world did DW get into and out of that house, abduct the girl and hold her, and then dispose of her and leave only trace amounts of evidence? And if he was so good about covering his tracks, why not get rid of the jacket? Only time will tell I guess.
346 posted on 06/20/2002 12:08:33 PM PDT by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson