[spectre]

Cut to commercial.

Is the Defense misleading the jury in presenting evidence of hair and stains that aren't directly related to DW's guilt? Smoke and mirrors?

sw

[spectre]

I meant PROSECUTION misleading the jury...OUCH!

sw

[cyncooper]

Do you mean prosecution? I would think that the NON human blood is presented because at the PH those stains had been brought up by defense implying the police had overlooked evidence. I think what happened was those stains were determined by then to be non human and that is why the detective who was given a summary of pertinant evidence was not aware of these non pertinant stains.

[Jrabbit]

My feed to the testimony is awful today. Was blood from MH discussed?

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Is the Defense Prosecution misleading the jury in presenting evidence of hair and stains that aren't directly related to DW's guilt? Smoke and mirrors?

I've been thinking that a lot. They keep referring to a large amount of evidence, etc. How much of it means anything?

I may have a stack of lottery tickets, but if none of them have the winning numbers, I have a stack of worthless paper.

As a juror, I would resent any attempt at games by the People. Just give me what matters and knock off the little innuendo garbage.