Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jacquej
You are going to need some strong DIRECT evidence that she was in the MH at some other time. I dont think just to suggest that she COULD have played in there will be enough to reduce the impact of her fingerprints in the MH especially by the bed.
151 posted on 06/20/2002 8:32:19 AM PDT by cynicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: cynicalman
I agree with you, cynicalmom. I would hope to have some direct evidence that she was in there playing.

But, considering that Brenda was complaining about it being there, and that Danielle had gotten into trouble for climbing over the gate, I have to consider that as enough a possibility to not conclude naything yet.

154 posted on 06/20/2002 8:41:15 AM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: cynicalman
You are going to need some strong DIRECT evidence that she was in the MH at some other time.

The fingerprint is direct evidence she was in the MH. It does not tell us when she was there or that she was murdered or held prisoner there. We know she was in DW's house. We know the MH was often parked very close to Danielle's house where she was allowed to walk and play. In my book, that is reasonable doubt.

I think DW might have done it. But it has not been proven beyond a resonable doubt -- yet.

The sad thing is, we may never know who did it.

156 posted on 06/20/2002 8:48:36 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson