Skip to comments.
WESTERFIELD TRIAL: Week Three - Day Four
San Diego Courtroom Trial
| none
Posted on 06/19/2002 8:45:03 PM PDT by NatureGirl
Here's the new thread, all ready for Thursday.
Testimony recently discussed includes fingerprint evidence, as well as Westerfield's clean laundry. The Van Dam home was (strangely) devoid of fingerprints, except for a couple of latents that didn't match any of the pizza party people or, apparently, David Westerfield.
Westerfield's motorhome didn't contain any of his fingerprints, but did have one print from Danielle L. (the daughter of Westerfield's ex-girlfriend), Jennifer (a friend of Danielle L.), and a partial from Danielle Van Dam.
The prosecution said yesterday that they would be finished "in seven court days".
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: danielle; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 841-855 next last
To: Rheo
DNA on 94D-2..shoulder of jacket...and other 2 locations of jacket..stain from lapel...94D-3..back of collar...( Consistent with BVD drooling on shoulder and lapel during slow-dancing?
321
posted on
06/20/2002 11:45:12 AM PDT
by
meadsjn
To: Rheo
significance of population statistics....software program mathmatically calculates from population databases from different racial groups from around the world to determine how common a match is....
322
posted on
06/20/2002 11:47:24 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
carpet profile...causcasion-approx likelyhood of carpet and Danielle...1 in 130 quadrillion
323
posted on
06/20/2002 11:48:38 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
Bless you Rheo, for all your hardwork!
324
posted on
06/20/2002 11:48:53 AM PDT
by
GoRepGo
To: meadsjn
Consistent with BVD drooling on shoulder and lapel during slow-dancing? No, since the blood (not "drool" as you so elegantly state it) is Danielle's, not Brenda's.
To: Rheo
American-African--1 in 1.7 quantrillion...larger #...Hispanic--1 in 6.6 quintillion
326
posted on
06/20/2002 11:49:30 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
jacket--C..1 in 670 quadrillion...AA-1 in 14/ quintillion..H-1 in 31 quintillion.
327
posted on
06/20/2002 11:50:17 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
lapel....inconsistant w/Danielle....consistant w/DW
328
posted on
06/20/2002 11:51:24 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
His goose appears all but cooked. It's going to be an interesting cross.
329
posted on
06/20/2002 11:52:13 AM PDT
by
jokar
To: Rheo
Clarke is showing table exhibit of her tests
330
posted on
06/20/2002 11:52:39 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Another thing that bothers me is that people are making a big deal about the lack of prints in the MH, and that there was a "thin" layer of dust as well. It's a well known fact that DW was a neat freak, so it stands to reason that he thoroughlly cleaned the MH after each use. I don't own an RV, but I do have a boat, and I would be willing to bet that my boat would have very few latent prints in it as well. It's not that I go through it trying to wipe prints away, but most of the places that would be most likely to accumulate prints are the areas that get cleaned after each use. You really do have to clean the insides of boats and RV's pretty good after use, as they spend most of their time just sitting, and any mess you leave will be that much harder to clean up if you let it sit closed up for any length of time. You also need to make sure that all messes are cleaned up becuase of odor problems as well. You leave a little drippings of food on a surface inside, you can get ready to vomit if you walk through the door and left that sitting for a week! IMO, the lack of latents in the MH does not raise any red flags to me, and that's from someone who is far from being a neat freak, but understands that the boat or RV better be cleaned up BEFORE you leave it, or you'll have an even bigger job the next time you want to use it.
To: Rheo; All
So what is the conclusion from Danielle's underpants? Did the DNA just state that the stains were indeed hers, or her's with someone else's?
sw
332
posted on
06/20/2002 11:56:25 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Rheo
so is there or isn't there DNA from Danielle on the jacket. (having a hard time following)
To: jokar
It aint over till the fat lady sings...(or in this case perhaps, Barb!) lol - or at least until the trial is over.
334
posted on
06/20/2002 11:57:46 AM PDT
by
GoRepGo
To: ThinkingMan
Yes - there is Danielle's DNA on the jacket.
To: redlipstick
thanks
To: ThinkingMan
The shoulder blood is Danielles...the lapel is not..but matches DW's genetic markers
337
posted on
06/20/2002 11:58:44 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: spectre
The underpants were just a "reference sample" for Danielle's DNA. Hasn't a thing to do with DW.
sw
338
posted on
06/20/2002 11:59:29 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Rheo
DNA on underwear is Danielles and matches the blood on carpet and shoulder of blood of jacket......missing some of this
339
posted on
06/20/2002 11:59:52 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
lost feed....checking notes for something..
340
posted on
06/20/2002 12:00:53 PM PDT
by
Rheo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 841-855 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson