OK. A morality based on rational self-interest (which, of course, is yours or anyone's prerogative) is diametrically opposed to Christian morality. Obviously, I think much more of the latter than the former (and that is my prerogative!). But your follow-up statements are incredibly presumptuous. As a Christian, I do not think that a man who commits evil acts and is unrepentant (not truly sorry) about them, but nevertheless talks frequently about God, is worthy of emulation. I do not know the inner workings of Clinton's mind, but to me he appears unrepentant. But I do not honestly know. I do not know what inner demons may trouble this man. That is why Christians are taught not to judge people (but to judge acts as being good or bad - and clearly many of his acts have been abominable). And the same for you - I could not possibly judge you, or see you as 'better' or 'worse' than Bill Clinton - just because your an atheist. But the primary difference between you and Christians is that Christians, rather than being OK with being motivated by self-interest, are called to be as self-less as possible - to give up one's desires and to work for the good of others. It is not a choice that true Christians may make - it is a requirement.