[SoothingDave]

If you believe that a woman should have to go through the pain of giving birth to a rapist's baby then every claim you make about valuing human freedom and dignity is a lie. Not only are you forcing her to give him a child, you're forcing her to pay out of her wallet for 18+ years for his evil.

They have this new thing, it's called "adoption."

SD

[ArGee]

They have this new thing, it's called "adoption."

There are obvious signs of someone who is repeating propaganda rather than thinking independently.

The big key in that post was the fact that someone else raped the woman, but by making abortion illegal I would be forcing her to carry a baby. The rapist would be forcing her to carry a baby. I would not be forcing her to take any action whatsoever. I would just be stopping her from taking the morally repugnant action of killing a child who never raped anyone.

But such twists of logic are the standard MO of the left.

Shalom.

[dheretic]

Yes, I think by law anti-abortionists should be required to adopt any crack baby or rapist's baby if that is there won't be abortions. I would only be willing to abolish abortion if a national registry of opinion were to be established. Anyone in favor if its abolition would be required by law to adopt any kid the state puts at their doorstep. If you refuse you are either fined or sent to prison. If you are going to burden society with your opinion you should have to pay dearly out of your pocket for it.