Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
Except that you don't know if a child is present or not. So technically, it's not an abortion.

I'm not willing to take that risk. If there is a child, you are killing it, whether or not you "know" that child is there. You "know" that there is a chance that a child has been conceived, and you are therefore willing to kill the child regardless of your knowledge. I suppose it's easier for some people to lie to themselves than to admit they are killing their child.

54 posted on 06/19/2002 2:14:43 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Gophack
I'm not willing to take that risk.

Then I guess you will just have to live with Abortion-on-demand then. If you can't differentuate between a doctor knowingly killing a baby and a pill that might prevent a pregnancy, we will just have to live with the status quo.

61 posted on 06/19/2002 3:09:00 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson