[dheretic]

No, if she has the option of abortion she has no grounds to make that argument on. She had the option of ending the pregnancy. If she goes to term she has no basis on which to claim that she shouldn't take care of the baby.

[FreeTally]

No, if she has the option of abortion she has no grounds to make that argument on.

Im not sure if you understood. The argument I was mentioning is against making abortion illegal, because if "a woman is forced to cary the baby to term, then she is a ward of the state". I think the argument is illogical and silly, because one is forced to care for the child for 18 years(in most cases), and that too, under the same logic, would make the woman(and the man) a "ward of the state".