Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gordgekko
How, short of totalitarian government agencies, can they control what is in a woman's womb, and when?

I must have flunked biology. I always thought a woman had control over what's in her womb. I hadn't realized that a baby could plant its little self there ex nihilo.

And if the author is making plaintive pleas for "middle ground," let's try this:

1. Overturn the unconstitutional Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions.
2. Let the citizens of each state decide these life questions. It's really their prerogative.

14 posted on 06/19/2002 12:57:28 PM PDT by Caleb1411
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Caleb1411
I must have flunked biology. I always thought a woman had control over what's in her womb. I hadn't realized that a baby could plant its little self there ex nihilo.

I have always laughed at the argument of "forcing a woman to carry a baby to term makes her a ward of the state". By that logic, forcing you to care for it for 18 years makes you a ward of the state. The lack of logic in these arguments is almost astounding.

16 posted on 06/19/2002 1:04:43 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson