Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A viewpoint on accountability - Orlando Sentinel MY WORD - Low scores? Throw out the test - By L. Calvin Dillon | My Word (June 18, 2002 ) [Full Text] If you really want to help the students and teachers at Mollie Ray Elementary and the other schools where test scores are low, don't throw more money at them. Throw out the test and the school grading system.

I know what you are thinking; "This must be one of those teachers from an F school, trying to rationalize and justify how he really did teach his kids, but they flunked anyway because of poverty or lack of parental involvement." Actually, I teach at the only high school in Orange County to get a B on Gov Jeb. Bush's grading system. My problem is not with what grade schools get; my problem is that we are giving grades at all.

We don't grade police departments on how many people "fail" and get arrested. We don't grade fire departments based on how many houses they "let" burn to the ground because they "didn't care about the ones they couldn't save." Why don't we treat schools with the same understanding and respect? The answer is simple; we don't respect what teachers do, and we are blindly putting our faith in the ability of a single measure to tell us what we are worth.

The reality is that some kids will never test well on a multiple-choice standardized test. I am not talking about kids raised in poverty, or minority children who traditionally perform poorly on standardized tests. I have been working with rising seniors who have failed the 10th-grade FCAT three times already.

These are not uneducated, illiterate students who have been "socially promoted on their merry way to a lifetime of poverty." These are children whose skills lie in other areas, such as music, the arts, or verbal communication. Some suffer from test anxiety. They get good grades in hard classes, they do quality work, and they can read just fine. They just can't pass this test because they don't fit the mold of the kind of child who scores well on it. You cannot measure every child's worth with a test like FCAT.

One of my rising seniors gets so worked up the night before the test that she vomits and gets no sleep. She has flunked it three times. If she does not pass the test before March, she will not graduate. This is a smart, motivated child who works hard and consistently makes the honor roll, but Bush's A+ Plan and FCAT will deny her a high school diploma because of one test score.

Another of my 10th-graders missed passing by one point. Are we really prepared to put enough faith in this test to say that, because a child misses one question on one test, he doesn't deserve his diploma?

Mollie Ray missed scoring a D by three points on the state's scale. Yet we are confident in devaluing the hard work those teachers and students did because of those three points. Lakeville and Palm Lake Elementary schools each scored an A, but the difference between the school scores was 90 points. How does this make sense?

In February, state lawmakers in Kansas answered questions from the Kansas statewide achievement test so they could get a feel for what the experience is like for the children. I challenge Bush and state legislators to do the same. If your test really is the accurate measure of a person's value and education you claim it to be, take it yourself and see what you are worth. [End]

L. Calvin Dillon lives in Oviedo.

1 posted on 06/19/2002 3:28:18 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
School officials quit amid probe of TAAS scheme ***Additionally, the report states, Bailey violated the state education agency's rules when she ordered a custodian to discard a stack of TAAS booklets he had found near a trash can. Investigators also said the answer sheets for 20 10th-graders were changed to portray them as 11th-graders. The school's state rating is based only on the scores of 10th-graders. "The accountability rating for Bush High School will be, therefore, inaccurate," investigators said.

They concluded that Bailey intentionally manipulated the grade levels of dozens of students to improve the school's chances for obtaining an exemplary rating. "One witness reported that when he told Bailey about his concerns that she was violating TEA and TAAS rules and regulations, Bailey is alleged to have said she didn't care," the report states. "She is alleged to have told witnesses that she would hang the reprimand from TEA alongside the certificate showing that Bush High School had achieved exemplary rating."***

2 posted on 06/19/2002 3:35:44 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm not an expert on testing, other than having taken a lot of them over the course of my academic career (B.A. + two aborted graduate school programs) and so I guess I do fit the mold of people who can take standardized tests.

I'm just wondering what that mold is?

If I follow the teacher's rationale, it sounds as if they should only be tested on things at which they excel. It would be nice if society could function only with music, art, and "oral communication," i.e. expressing feelings or talking with friends, but it doesn't work that way. Additionally, the reason why the grades a lot of times are discounted is that, frankly, people do not in many cases "trust" the grading schemes of the teachers due to grade inflation and social promotion in a lot of school districts.

By the way, police departments do seem to get graded on arrests rates, keep extensive track of arrests, number of cases open vs closed, etc., and they do get reported at least quarterly on the local radio and newspaper in our community. It's pretty much the same with the fire department.
3 posted on 06/19/2002 3:51:48 AM PDT by perez24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
here's an article right up your alley.
6 posted on 06/19/2002 7:08:25 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Kids naturally want to learn, and government school teachers obstruct this process. The largest classes have the most diluted negative influence of the teachers, and therefore do best. Is this just about correct?
7 posted on 06/19/2002 7:09:16 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Master teachers will tell you that the larger class offers them a larger middle to teach to. I've seen these teachers handle 30 to 40 kids like an artists mosaic, whereas a less experienced teacher can struggle with 18-20.
8 posted on 06/19/2002 7:41:56 AM PDT by Katya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Do you suppose that this will take some of the wind out of the sails of those behind the amendment to mandate smaller class sizes? I fear that if this is on the ballot, the dumb voters will all support it because everyone "knows" that smaller class sizes means better education, right?

We really need to get the word out on these actual results to counter the "smaller is better" perception that is out there. Smaller class sizes mean more teachers, more classrooms, and great increases in spending to accomplish it. There are much more effective ways to improve education that don't cost a penny more, and those need to be implemented instead of this gift to the teachers' unions.

9 posted on 06/19/2002 8:19:03 AM PDT by Truth Addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
This will make the teachers unions really really mad.
11 posted on 06/19/2002 8:34:23 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The reality is that some kids will never test well on a multiple-choice standardized test. I am not talking about kids raised in poverty, or minority children who traditionally perform poorly on standardized tests. I have been working with rising seniors who have failed the 10th-grade FCAT three times already. These are not uneducated, illiterate students who have been "socially promoted on their merry way to a lifetime of poverty." These are children whose skills lie in other areas, such as music, the arts, or verbal communication.

Funny how some schools seem to end up with drastically disproportionate numbers of kids "whose skills lie in other areas."

12 posted on 06/19/2002 8:41:48 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson