[monday]

Hmmm.... I thought I was a libertarian, but I agree pretty much with Farah. Doe's that mean I am not a libertarian either?

I think there might be more libertarians than Farah realizes that agree with him:^)

[tdadams]

I'm a libertarian, but not a Libertarian. There's a difference. One is a thinking, realistic libertarian. The other is a brain-dead Libertarian living in a theoretical world.

[Mark Bahner]

"Hmmm.... I thought I was a libertarian, but I agree pretty much with Farah. Doe's that mean I am not a libertarian either?"

I may mean you're simply disingenuous or ignorant, as Farah may be. Farah has explained why he isn't a liberal, a conservative, or a libertarian.

But I've got news for Mr. Farah...there isn't a Conservative Party or a Liberal Party in the United States. There IS a Libertarian Party.

Mr. Farah is being fundamentally dishonest if he refuses to acknowledge that there is one party in the U.S. that suits his political philosophy more than others. Perhaps it would be the Libertarian Party. Or the Constitution Party. Or perhaps is would be the Libertarian Party at the FEDERAL level, but some other party at the state and local level.

But to write, "I'm not...(anything)" is dishonest. Who does he vote for? (And if he doesn't vote, why should anyone respect his political opinions?)