To: Quix
Only that I'm very concerned about the Yucca Mtn. region. It just had a 4.4 13 miles from the site of the nuclear waste repository. I don't want that stuff here...its unsafe.
178 posted on
06/18/2002 10:56:34 PM PDT by
brat
To: brat
I THINK that stuff is UNSAFE everywhere.
I ALSO THINK IT'S A SHAM ISSUE. I BELIEVE THE GOV HAS AT LEAST 2-3 DIFFERENT, WORKABLE, ECONOMICAL WAYS OF DISPOSING OF IT BY PROCESSING IT UNTIL IT'S ALMOST ALL TOTALLY HARMLESS AND WHAT'S LEFT THAT'S NOT IS MUCH MORE EASILY STORABLE. . . POSSIBLY EVEN SO IT'S ALL RENDERED HARMLESS.
I don't understand the sham issue but it feels like some sort of set-up for some population manipulation somehow. I just don't understand it. But I'm reasonably certain there are technical ways of rendering it harmless. I've even read such at different times but can't begin to retrieve where I read such.
181 posted on
06/19/2002 1:15:58 AM PDT by
Quix
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson