Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix
Only that I'm very concerned about the Yucca Mtn. region. It just had a 4.4 13 miles from the site of the nuclear waste repository. I don't want that stuff here...its unsafe.
178 posted on 06/18/2002 10:56:34 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: brat
I THINK that stuff is UNSAFE everywhere.

I ALSO THINK IT'S A SHAM ISSUE. I BELIEVE THE GOV HAS AT LEAST 2-3 DIFFERENT, WORKABLE, ECONOMICAL WAYS OF DISPOSING OF IT BY PROCESSING IT UNTIL IT'S ALMOST ALL TOTALLY HARMLESS AND WHAT'S LEFT THAT'S NOT IS MUCH MORE EASILY STORABLE. . . POSSIBLY EVEN SO IT'S ALL RENDERED HARMLESS.

I don't understand the sham issue but it feels like some sort of set-up for some population manipulation somehow. I just don't understand it. But I'm reasonably certain there are technical ways of rendering it harmless. I've even read such at different times but can't begin to retrieve where I read such.
181 posted on 06/19/2002 1:15:58 AM PDT by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson