Actually, the rants you've seen are against pissants like yourself who have NO, ABSOLUTELY ZERO, information about this case other than what they vaunted news media--you know, the ones you love to revile when they report on the Clintons?--have put out, much of which has been erroneous, and yet you still come up with this wild speculations that don't even have a corrollary in history.
In other words, typical FReeper cretins: The less they know about something, the more extravagant their opinions.
So, you need to understand you're going to be rebuked by those of us who know a little bit more about "the Mormon code" than you do.
Why not stop with the "you have no first-hand knowledge of this case" red herring and the personal attacks on posters who spout fairly "creative" theories and who even make fantastical conclusions about this case?
For the most part, posts on Free Republic are by people who have no first-hand knowledge of various subjects and rely on media reports, books, etc. for their information. But that's the nature of the forum.
Would it make sense to you to limit posting on say, California Gun Control Permit Laws only to FR posters who have applied for California Gun Permits? Of course not.
Perhaps if you prefer a moderated "SLC-Mormons-only-discuss-Smart-case" forum, you should start one of your own with Yahoo Groups?
Of course, you're violating your own dictum here since on this and many other threads you make conclusions on posters' level of "first-hand knowledge" without having any of such "first-hand knowledge" of your own about the poster's experience or locale.
Just as you find the bizarre theories bandied about here to be distracting, I find your defensive and short-tempered posts to be more distracting and even less topical. You've stated your case already on many threads.
And furthermore, you calling posters "cretins" and "pissants" is a crude way to convince people of the decency of your "cause."
Expecting a name-calling response any minute now...