To attempt to censor [pornography], regulate it, or otherwise altar a freedom to choose what one reads or watches for entertainment, gives a few individuals the power to regulate the arts for the rest of society. What's destroyed in this process may be worse than what's there in the beginning.
The corporation that I work for cares not a whit about me as a person, but reduces me to a fuction to satisfy its own needs. In the same way, clothing models or actors in television commercials are reduced into depersonalized figures who serve merely to sell the product.
Thus, the reductionist argument advocated by the posted article seems to be more of an idictment of free market capitalism than it does pornography. This is perhaps why the Catholic Church has traditionally contained a large socialist strain...