Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Day
Funny how you porn champions have to slam people of faith. Notice no one has preached on this thread. It was strictly the effects as described in the article. I guess, though, when you cheer porn it shouldn't be surprising that you're hostile to religion.
195 posted on 06/17/2002 11:03:05 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: JMJ333
Several times now you have unfairly accused people on this thread of what you call "bait and switch" just because they choose to bring up another perspective on the issue at hand (or in at least one case, because you clearly misunderstood how relevant the person's point was to the issue).

You have also complained repeatedly about how no one (you say) actually addresses the essay itself (even though a number of people have).

This is ironic, because when *I* deconstructed a portion of the essay and pointed out the flaws therein, your response is to ignore my actual points and do a bait-and-switch of your own by responding with nothing but an irrelevant rant:

Funny how you porn champions have to slam people of faith. Notice no one has preached on this thread. It was strictly the effects as described in the article. I guess, though, when you cheer porn it shouldn't be surprising that you're hostile to religion.

You need to get your glasses checked, because I didn't mention faith or religion in the least.

Hint: The phrase "holier-than-thou", which apparently caused your knee to jerk so violently, is not restricted to theological uses. It's quite often used to describe any sort of "I'm a better person than the scum who aren't like me" attitude, and that's how I was using it, as should have been entirely clear from the context.

I have no "hostility to religion". Your reflexive rant, based on nothing more than your hypersensitive reaction to a single word in my post, says a lot more about you than it does about me.

I am hardly a "porn champion", I have never "slammed people of faith", I said nothing that would indicate that I thought anyone was "preaching" on this thread, and I don't "cheer porn".

You presume hugely. Your arrogance is breathtaking. I regret to inform you that you are not nearly as insightful as you apparently think you are. You struck out with every conclusion you have attempted to draw about me.

And you ran away (spewing insults) from the opportunity to address my comments on the essay directly, with anything approaching a rational rebuttal. You're more interested in broadly denouncing me.

Despite your protestations, I don't think you're as interested in having an actual discussion on this topic as you are in exercising your (here's that phrase again) holier-than-thou attitude. Any time someone has dared take issue with any aspect of the article, you've slammed them as sex-crazed/god-haters/lowlifes, and dismissed them as being beneath your righteous self.

Pride is one of the deadly sins, too, you know.

258 posted on 06/18/2002 1:04:09 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Funny how you porn champions have to slam people of faith. Notice no one has preached on this thread. It was strictly the effects as described in the article.

Come on, you're embarrassing yourself. The article wasn't some scientific report on the outcome of an experiment, it was a sermon!

275 posted on 06/18/2002 6:30:50 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson