Replies

It almost certainly has something to do with status as "a government contractor." By rejecting this business in a formal way, they seem to be defining themselves as "not a government contractor." Why, who knows. The employment limitations that are a function of EOs jump to mind, but Home Depot hires anyone, so that shouldn't be a concern. Unless, there is some obscure issue like not wanting to hire folks in wheelchairs (not a good example because it is covered by ADA) or something like that.

The only other thing I can think of is an issue of petty personal concern. The daughter of an HD VP drives a delivery truck for the store in West Cupcake and when she tried to deliver to the army base, she got frisked/fondled and the truck was searched etc.And, after no local satisfaction, HD feels that the only way to get a response is to make a big deal out of it.

BTW, I have been going to Home Depot lately. The estalished Lowes, visible right down the block, is always crowded so if you go to the new HD, there is seldom anyone there and the employees can actually be found and asked questions.

The estalished Lowes, visible right down the block, is always crowded so if you go to the new HD, there is seldom anyone there and the employees can actually be found and asked questions.

That's the exact opposite of my experience. I go to Lowes in another part of the (DFW) metroplex, passing up a Home Depot (except for quick in and out trips) about a half mile away.

By rejecting this business in a formal way, they seem to be defining themselves as "not a government contractor." Why, who knows.

Because government contractors are required to maintain affirmative action plans which is a nice way of saying "quotas." Freepers should applaud them for putting their money where their mouth is and taking a stand against government intrusion into the running of their business.