Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SBeck
This is wonderful news! There's nothing like the pride of ownership to turn a welfare-minded citizen into a self-reliant citizen.
3 posted on 06/16/2002 6:38:29 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: abclily
The only obstacle is bad credit history. The integrity of the pool of mortgage money is holy. What makes it so secure is the fact that it will be repaid. If you introduce a default rate similar to their credit history's indicate, you will get no investment of additional capital from the investor, you will get civil unrest due to the foreclosures(a racial thing ya know), and bank failures. You cannot make someone responsible through home purchase. Dumb idea!
12 posted on 06/16/2002 7:12:31 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: abclily
This was the theory of the Great Society which also tried to use hand-outs to 'lift' people into the middle class. This is yet another example of the same old bankrupt welfare state philosophy of something for nothing and blatant vote buying.
22 posted on 06/16/2002 8:32:11 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: abclily
This is wonderful news! There's nothing like the pride of ownership to turn a welfare-minded citizen into a self-reliant citizen.

I would hope that someone was a self-reliant citizen first. This only reinforces dependency on government. The response will be "the government got me my home."

I live in a middle-class townhouse development of which most of the owners are recent immigrants. I applaud all of them that have worked hard and saved to be able to make their first home purchase (although I wish that some had left the third world back in the third world). How are they able to do it while other minorities have not? Perhaps different ethics - work hard and save?

I would be more accepting of some type of tax break for all Americans to help them save up for a down payment. It took us every nickel we had to get ours together and making the payments with the PMI is not easy, but we are doing it.

What this does is simply put one group against another. If I choose not to live in a "low-income area" I can't qualify. Of course, being a white male would probably disqulaify me outright. So my money is being extracted to give to someone else so they can simply ask for the down payment money while we scrimped and saved to get ours.

Also, what about minorities that want to get a house so they can escape the high crime and degradation of the inner cities? I was recently in Charlotte looking at houses. We were not completely familiar with all of the surrounding areas so we drove to several locations that had home listings priced where we could afford them. The first place we went was beautiful. Every home was immaculate (at least the outsides). They must have put untold hours into maintaining their yards. Then we noticed that all of the owners were black. These people worked hard and saved so that they could escape the problems of the ghetto and none of them would have gotten any help from this program.

I see this as nothing but another feel-good, doomed to failure, handout program. Kemp tried some similar deal with his "enterprise zones" that failed miserably. The only way to make a difference along these lines is to alter the mindset of people that aren't doing the right thing.

I am furious at this administration. He has one good appointee - Rumsfeld. The rest only qualify as better than what we had under Clinton (or only marginally less of an embarrasment). To me, that is just not good enough. He is using the same tactics Clinton did. Just go along with the other party to steal their thunder. Given a choice it might be better to have a Democrat that goes along with the Republican initiatives rather that a Republican that goes along with all of the Democrat initiatives.

I had to hold my nose to vote for Bush in 2000. Will I be able to hold my nose again in 2004. The way things are going, it is going to be much more difficult.

34 posted on 06/16/2002 9:53:55 AM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: abclily
Amen. Now if Bush will only veto the bankruptcy "reform" bill. parsy.
37 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:23 AM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: abclily
There's nothing like the pride of ownership to turn a welfare-minded citizen into a self-reliant citizen.

Government subsidies create a disincentive to be responsible.

62 posted on 06/16/2002 9:11:17 PM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson