To: goldenstategirl; Siobhan; eastsider; Aquinasfan; maryz; American Colleen; *Catholic_list
Mahony has established a record every bit as shameful as Boston's much-maligned Cardinal Bernard Law during his 17 years as archbishop of Los Angeles, and earlier when he was bishop of Stockton. But he'll never be portrayed in the same vain as Law, because Law is considered a conservative and Baloney is a liberal. Mother Angelica had this beaut pegged way back.
To: ThomasMore
Doesn't Malony have friends -- or a least one friend -- at the LA Times who seems to see that stuff about him doesn't appear or is downplayed?
25 posted on
06/16/2002 9:16:05 AM PDT by
maryz
To: ThomasMore; livius; AKA Elena; Diago; Romulus; goldenstategirl; nickcarraway; jrherreid
Yes, Mother Angelica was absolutely right about Cardinal Mahony.
We must bring him down by sending documentation and information on him to the Weekly Standard, to Rod Dreher, to Peggy Noonan, to Deal Hudson, to the Washington Times -- to any person in the news biz and pray to God they run with it.
26 posted on
06/16/2002 9:19:14 AM PDT by
Siobhan
To: nickcarraway;maryz;Jeff Chandler;Larry Lied;ThomasMore;Siobhan;Romulus;Diago;MrNatural;all
If Mahoney is connected enough to get whomever he wants appointed bishop (as in Levada), then where do the dominoes fall
upward?
Can we get some kind of e-mail/snail mail directory of addresses going for letter writing campaigns; i.e. Vatican addresses, diocesan addresses, EWTN, Wanderer, etc? I'm thinking of a thread that we could all bookmark to keep handy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson