Too bad the FBI didn't do their job in 95 when the trail was hot.
I'm not so sure that they didn't do their job.
I firmly believe that Clinton did not want to persue Middle Eastern terrorists throughout his terms. Perhaps they contributed to the DNC.
Clinton used the OKC bombing to further his own agenda. I'm sure he deiliberatley had the FBI suppress evidence of any ME connection.
Ask OKC Submariner to post the statement made by the jury forewoman at the end of Nichols trial about the conduct of the FBI.
Too bad the FBI didn't do their job in 95 when the trail was hot.
They weren't interested in "doing their jobs." They were prevented from doing their jobs by Clinton's criminal conspiracy of power.
My point is.. don't you think it is entirely possible that the FBI did know of John Doe #2, and in fact have been following Padilla? That they suspected him, but could not definitively tie him to Oklahoma City?
I mean, thanks to the Torecceli Amendment, and other things you probably know about (like some friends of ours know) Agents haven't always been ABLE to do what needed to be done. They couldn't always act in the best interest of our Nations security. Thier hands were tied by a HUGE beaurocracy. Which we feel this administration is very aware of and is trying to change.
I have a feeling this guy is connected to Oklahoma. Just a gut feeling.. he indeed resembles the sketches of John Doe #2!!
But I'm wondering if it may not even be wise, to not bring this to the forefront if you are the Government. I mean, McVeigh never revealed who was behind his actions, and we all know he and Nichols didn't just act on their own. (At least we never believed that.... and after getting private investigators neither did some of the Victims family members in Oklahoma who did investigations on their own!!).
So my question I'm laying out here for people to think about is.. "Is our Government going after bigger fish?" knowing what they do regarding the other perps involved in all this. Letting him gather intelligence for them while watching him. Just a thought.. and I'd like to see your take on it. Thanks.
Seems like the FBI did it's job very well in '95--assuming that it's job was to wrap up the case as quickly as possible, give no embarassment to Willie Clinton, and create a scenario for hoodwinking the public. I can't think of how they could have done that job any better.