Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drmatt
Amazing, a government agency standing in the way of technology. /sarcasm.

I know a lot about the "current" containment structures, and they are amazing pieces of engineering. I put quotes around "current," because the "current" containment buildings are based on what, 40 to 50 year old designs? So, it does not come as a huge surprise there is a better design out there. What, if any, fuel limitations does MHR have?

80 posted on 06/14/2002 10:12:56 PM PDT by stylin_geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: stylin_geek
The Germans have made the most progress with development of coated particle fuel. Based on the German experience, this fuel can operate safely at 1300 C for extended periods during normal operation and can withstand a complete loss of cooling accident, where fuel temperatures reach 1600 C for short periods of time. This fuel design also allows for very high burnup in a single pass. Because of the fuel's high temperature capability, the MHR operates at a much higher thermal efficiency than water-cooled reactors (48% vs. 32%).
135 posted on 06/17/2002 10:36:43 AM PDT by drmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson