Replies

In your opinion, is supplying medical marijuana to patients in accordance with State law aiding the terrorists?

I don't know. I am opposed to this state "law" because it is bad strategy, it is illegal, and because it expends federal resources--the courts, the tax dollars required to ejudicate the case--which could be better used elsewhere. A state cannot nullify a Federal law. This stuff is a waste of time. If someone wants to say it takes time away from other concerns, including terrorism, I guess you can say that. I don't really know if it's true.

The law was not declared illegal in court. Basically the court said that CA and the US had their own laws and even though they were contradictory, both laws were left standing.

What is the basis for saying it is illegal?

Also, I've got to call you on saying you don't know enough to have an opinion on whether or not supplying medical marijuana in accordance with State law is aiding the terrorists.

You brought up the terrorist issue on a medical marijuana thread. Now you're saying you don't know enough to have an opinion.

Do I have that right?