[Karson]

Do you think they are stalling on the DNA testimony, possibly waiting for more test results? Or do you think they are waiting until closer to the end of their case thinking it will have more impact on the jury? Isn't it true that we remember the most recent things we've heard. It's hard for me to 'read' the prosecution's strategy so far.

[Rheo]

I don't know if their stalling, probably just bringing DNA in last so the jury has it fresh on their minds when Feldman presents his defense.

[cyncooper]

I think they will end strategically with the strongest evidence so it is freshest in the jurors' minds. However, I think the tedious-seeming testimony of MH maneuvers and and time he picked it up and left again is absolutely critical. Evidently some think evidence could be planted in order to frame DW, or that Danielle had access to the MH in the past. The prosecutor has to show this is not possible. Having numerous witnesses corroborate their observations of the MH(before they had a chance to "compare notes" or have the full picture via media, of DW's statements and such) is necessary to the State's case. Bottom line: No stall, just dotting i's and crossing t's.