Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOW TRUCK DRIVER CLAIMS WESTERFIELD TALKING TO SOMEONE: Phone Records Trace Westerfield's Movements
KNSD NBC ^ | June 13, 2002 | KNSD NBC

Posted on 06/13/2002 4:28:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

TOW TRUCK DRIVER CLAIMS HE HEARD WESTERFIELD TALKING TO SOMEONE!!!

Phone Records, Witnesses Trace Westerfield's Movements

Witnesses On Day 7 Show Movements

 

POSTED: 12:56 p.m. PDT June 13, 2002
UPDATED: 2:41 p.m. PDT June 13, 2002

 

SAN DIEGO -- The prosecution in the David Westerfield murder trial called on a cell phone company employee and several campers Thursday to verify the defendant's whereabouts the weekend Danielle van Dam disappeared.

A series of calls from Westerfield's cell phone in early February appeared to mirror his rambling motor home trip to the beaches of southern San Diego County and the Imperial Valley deserts, Verizon Wireless representative Greg Sheets testified.

But on cross-examination, Westerfield's defense attorney, Steven Feldman, sought to show that the cell phone calls were not a reliable record of Westerfield's locations that weekend. Under questioning by Feldman, Sheets admitted that the records don't give precise locations and don't identify the user of the phone.

Westerfield is charged with kidnapping and murdering Danielle. He could face the death penalty if he's convicted.

The prosecution also called a series of witnesses who were at Silver Strand State Beach on Saturday, Feb. 2. Westerfield said he drove his motor home to Silver Strand that morning.

Beverly Jean Askey of El Cajon testified that her family was already at the beach when a motor home that she later learned was Westerfield's pulled into a nearby space sometime before 10 a.m. It was a nice, sunny day she said, yet no one came out of the vehicle.

"He just pulled up, he pulled the front window closed and I never saw anyone again," Askey said.

Two other campers said they saw Westerfield's motor home and noticed that it appeared closed up.

Earlier, Angela Elkus, a resident of the Sabre Springs neighborhood where the van Dams and Westerfield lived, answered questions about the motor home. She said she had seen children playing around the vehicle three or four times when it was parked on the street, but she said they were mostly older children. She also talked about a visit to the van Dam home after Danielle disappeared.

  Elkus said she had never been to the home before, but she brought food over for the family on the Sunday after the little girl disappeared. She said that the family's dog appeared "scared, shy, confused and perfectly still" when she came in the house, and it did not bark, she said. Legal analysts say prosecutors want to convince the jury that a stranger could have come into the house and taken Danielle without the dog barking.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 861-875 next last
To: theirjustdue
Maybe he thought he had a Cone of Silence to go along with his invisibility cloak and his Ruby Slippers. : )
81 posted on 06/13/2002 6:10:59 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Rebuttal.

Forget the voices. It is undeniable that DW was well off the road and got stuck and had to be dug out.

No argument. He was 1/4 mile off the road. How far was he away from other motorhomes?

He then took off forgetting his ramps.

Were the ramps his ? And if so, what kind of ramps were these?

That is the objective truth of the guy's testimony and referencing Miz's article about him getting the date mixed up it doesn't matter. I have doubt about the voice testimony----that is, I think it happened but I would not draw a conclusion that Danielle was in the MH.

So, throw out the voices, and the misstatement about the date. Fair enough.

But, we are left that DW hightailed it out of there for whatever reason.

I think the TT driver changed his story on this too, but let's see. You have been driving around trying to find something fun to do. You head to a spot in the desert where lively activities happen. You get stuck, you ruin some of your foldup chairs trying to get out, you have to use up the rest of your cash to pay the driver, you don't have your wallet, you are hot and tired, you help the driver do the work to get you out, so finally when he gets you unstuck, the last thing on your mind would be to sit around and chat with the TT driver for a half hour or so, wouldn't you think ?

82 posted on 06/13/2002 6:13:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
The van Dam's have testified the dog was raised around others that had been "debarked."

Yeah, for the whole first 7 - 8 weeks of its life.

83 posted on 06/13/2002 6:17:03 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
If that's the implication Dusek is making, I find it very hard to believe that anyone could buy into a theory, that DW would be talking through the MH to Danielle (if he in fact had her at all), while a witness was standing right there to overhear it.

Maybe they're trying to imply that Danielle let out a muffled cry for help. The "voice" came from Danielle, not DW, and since DW was on the other side, he didn't hear it. That's the way I took it. I kept waiting for him to ask if the voice sounded like it could've been that of a small child's, but he didn't. So, maybe I was wrong in my interpretation.
84 posted on 06/13/2002 6:17:03 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
DW didn't know Barbara prior to seeing her with BVD at Dad's before 2/1. I suspect that he may have gotten her number that night and made arrangements to go to the desert with her the next day. This may be why the prosecution hasn't called her as a witness. If true, she's DW's alibi.
85 posted on 06/13/2002 6:18:06 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
"Maybe he thought he had a Cone of Silence to go along with his invisibility cloak and his Ruby Slippers. : )"

ROTFLMAO! Hadn't thought of that. But how could DW have known the TT driver communicated regularly with UFO's in the desert and thwarted his "cone of silence"? LOL

86 posted on 06/13/2002 6:19:04 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
Dusek is overplaying his hand. The jury gets the idea. His job of trying to link DW with hiding Danielle in the MH can easily be explained, so far.

The Jury wants to hear some REAL evidence. Again, we wait...sigh.

sw

87 posted on 06/13/2002 6:20:54 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"The Jury wants to hear some REAL evidence. Again, we wait...sigh."

Absolutely!

88 posted on 06/13/2002 6:23:57 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
The dog didn't bark but he might of been so upset about something going on in the house that he tore his dog bed to pieces.
89 posted on 06/13/2002 6:26:47 PM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nycgal
He wasn't suppose to know her, that's right.

He didn't have a date to take her to the desert. He went to beach, paid for two days. Only stayed 3 hours (Phone call from Barb?), went home, then Ramona to the desert, maybe picking up Barb (and maybe a 58 pound package) drives to desert. Gets stuck. Get out of there. Too many clues along the way. Drives back to beach and hopes no one remember's him from desert? Explains a lot of things: No evidence in SUV, No evidence of DW in VD's house.

90 posted on 06/13/2002 6:30:45 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The ramps belonged to the tt driver. W left some wood, like firewood.
91 posted on 06/13/2002 6:31:10 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
"Maybe they're trying to imply that Danielle let out a muffled cry for help."

Could be. I had to miss all that testimony when CTV ended, but Rheo did a great job keeping us filled in on the happenings.

I wouldn't think it any more likely though. DW would have had her mouth gagged in some way. Now if it was thumping (kicking, pounding) he heard, that would seem much more feasible. To me anyway.

92 posted on 06/13/2002 6:31:42 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Ping! to a new thread.

Post here.

sw

93 posted on 06/13/2002 6:32:05 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Maybe they're trying to imply that Danielle let out a muffled cry for help.

This is a tactic used in jury trials all the time. It is similiar to the 'spit something out' then have an objection to it raised. Too late, you already said it and whether the judge admonishes the jury to disregard makes very little difference.

The implication tactic is being well used in this case. The prosecution doesn't have very good witnesses, so they go into these 'I thought I saw,or I thought I heard' things. They don't want to ask what kind of voice, as that would ruin the 'implication and imagination factor'. By not asking the jury is allowed to 'think' that it was Danielle. Doesn't matter whether there is any proof. The jury's imagination can jump to a conclusion just like anyone else. When we don't know the answer, we typically assume the worst.

POINT: What is this?
Everybody has one.
It is the most valuable thing in the world
Everyone's is different
No one else wants yours or cares what it's like.
No one can take it from you, but we all want to give it to everyone

SO......?

94 posted on 06/13/2002 6:33:46 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Lucky
Lucky, it has been established without a shadow of a doubt, that the dog DID bark! The van dams finally changed that story. Layla could and did bark.

sw

95 posted on 06/13/2002 6:35:18 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lucky; All
About the dog--a repost for those who might have missed it:

Happy, loving cheerful, affectionate and very rambunctious. Intelligent, but can be highly opinionated and willful, therefore this breed should have firm, experienced training from the start. Quick to learn, but resistant to repetitive training. Reserved with strangers and sometimes combative with other dogs. Socialize them well at an early age. Protective on his own territory. Very brave and loyal, it has a strong prey instinct. Do not trust with small non-canine animals. This is definitely not a herding or farm dog. The Weimaraner needs to live indoors as a member of the family. He needs attention and companionship. If relegated to a kennel life or if left alone too much, he can become very destructive and restless. He is a natural protector. Weimaraners are often kind to children, but are not recommended for very young ones because they are energetic enough to accidentally knock a child down. This breed likes to bark. Very hardy, with a good sense of smell, and a passionate worker, the Weimaraner can be used for all kinds of hunting.

Source

96 posted on 06/13/2002 6:40:59 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue;spectre
"The Jury wants to hear some REAL evidence. Again, we wait...sigh."

Absolutely!


I was listening to Rick Roberts' just prior to losing the feed completely, and he was practically salivating at the DNA evidence that was going to put DW away. He figures it'll come next week. He mentioned Dusek's opening statement claiming to place DW in the VD home, and then asked, "Do you remember that they took 2 sets of doors from the VD house?" He said that they have the evidence, and we'll hear it probably next week.

I kept wondering why can't we hear it now? If we did, it'd save so much time rather than hearing 20-30 people repeat accounts of his desert meanderings.
97 posted on 06/13/2002 6:42:16 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Maybe there was a glitch in the tests, and they're stalling for time.
98 posted on 06/13/2002 6:45:12 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
He needs attention and companionship. If relegated to a kennel life or if left alone too much, he can become very destructive and restless.

DVD admitted on the stand that the dog was neglected (probably as badly as the kids were).

99 posted on 06/13/2002 6:46:50 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Well, Rick Roberts has been right with his LE sources before. He has done a 180 turn-around recently. Maybe this time, he got the wrong info. Who knows?
100 posted on 06/13/2002 6:46:53 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 861-875 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson