Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bush2000
But there would be no way for the President to know their true intent unless they stated it as such.

Right. Which would make it wrong for him to take the lives of innocents. Furthermore, his insistence that they be unarmed and defensless puts their blood on his hands no matter what occurs.

789 posted on 06/17/2002 11:11:42 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies ]


To: Demidog
Right. Which would make it wrong for him to take the lives of innocents. Furthermore, his insistence that they be unarmed and defensless puts their blood on his hands no matter what occurs.

Don't sidestep the original issue: That taking the lives of innocents was a clear-cut case of murder. I've showed you a situation in which that clearly is not true.
793 posted on 06/17/2002 1:18:51 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson