Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79
If an inanimate object can, indeed, result in the violation of others rights, then yes, states can prohibit...

Sarah....? Sarah Brady...??

Izzzat you?

67 posted on 06/14/2002 2:13:18 PM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
A gun requires a conscious decision to use it. A nuke or hard drug are a danger in and of themselves. Now if you can figure out a way to make owning hard drugs legal, but taking them (similar to shooting a gun because of the violation of other's rights) illegal, then let us hear it.
72 posted on 06/14/2002 2:17:36 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson