[tpaine]

If the state, without consent of the majority suddenly banned bicycles just for the heck of it, that would be arbitrary and purposeless. -- tex

You got 'it' on bikes, -- to bad you can't understand the same principle appies to booze, guns, -- and even drugs. - 324 by tpaine

That is because the majority of the state supports hard drug prohibition, therefore it is not arbitrary; and they support that position because they view it as too much of a threat, therefore it is not purposeless.

What can I say to that bit of nonsense? - I'll assume that you THINK you've made a point. -- In actuality I'd guess its a vaguely circular argument. -- Care to explain?

[Texaggie79]

I have shown not only that hard drugs can be Constitutionally prohibited by states, but also that there is just cause to do so.