[Texaggie79]

No it isn't. It is totally relevant that the intended use of a hard drug is a threat to those around the user, therefore a violation of their rights.

[Alan Chapman]

...the intended use of a hard drug is a threat to those around the user, therefore a violation of their rights.

The intended use of a hard drug guns is a threat to those around the user, therefore a violation of their rights.

The intended use of a hard drug religion is a threat to those around the user, therefore a violation of their rights.

The intended use of a hard drug speech is a threat to those around the user, therefore a violation of their rights.