[tpaine]

The U.S. Constitution is the 'Law of the Land', and it guarantees that all states shall have a republican form of government. - Art IV, Sec 4.

States were given NO powers to prohibit 'substances', or any other type of property. -- In fact, the 14th specifically says that states cannot deprive persons of life, liberty or property without due process.
-- Prohibitory type law is not due process, it is a taking, - a banning of property before it can be used for 'evil'. - 267 by tpaine

The USC does not prohibit prohibition. It simply does not authorize the FED to do it. - tex

You are simply denying the constitutional facts as I posted them just above. -- Do you consider this an argument?

[Cultural Jihad]

In fact, the 14th specifically says that states cannot deprive persons of life, liberty or property without due process.

"Due process" defined by the handy Insta-Ideologuese-to-English translation service: "No one asked for my permission to ban recreational poisons or private nuclear weapons, and therefore the law is null and void."

[Texaggie79]

The fact that ownership of hard drugs violates the rights of your neighbors is far beyond due process in order to arrest you for possesion.