Only on their terms. What about this:
Democrats advanced two alternatives in the run-up to the final vote, both of which fell short of the 60-vote threshold required by Senate rules.That was a compromise bill offered by Kent Conrad. Among those voting against this permanent repeal of the estate tax were:One option, which got 38 votes, would have made the tax repeal permanent for all but the largest estates those over $3.5 million for individuals and $7 million for couples.
Frist, Bond, Gramm, Nickles, Grassley,Santorum, Hagel, Sessions, Hatch,Shelby, Hutchinson, Cleland Kyl Stevens Cochran Landrieu Thomas Domenici Warner Ensign McConnell Wyden
Those are just the big name GOPers so adamant about protecting the small businessmen and women of America. As Phil Gramm once said:
"I think small business is to people and government today what the small farmer was during the time of Jefferson," said Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas. "Small business is really the face of American prosperity."
So why not compromise? If they had voted for the Conrad bill, the estate tax would be repealed today for ALMOST everyone. I have read that the entire estate tax AS IS affects 2% of the population. I wonder how many people would have been affected under the Conrad version. Can you explain any of this?