Cretigo: Bingo game on the Crevo threads!

Cretigo web site ^ | Prof Weird

[VadeRetro]

Likewise if some of the evos see some of this stuff enough, some of the logic of it might start to sink in...

The antidote for "God Hates Idiots, Too . . ."

[VadeRetro]

. . . thus after many thousands of generations of being disfunctional . . .

No. Even when you try to nod toward anticipating and recapitulating the other guy's argument, you can't do it right. It takes me back to jennyp's point that any evo can cite all the creationist stuff perfectly, to the extent of even passing as a creationist. No creationist can pass as an evo, there's this psychological horror of the other side's position. Blasphemy, maybe.

It's like this. The population stays adapted. It changes over time because the environment changes and the population is staying adapted.

[Saturnalia]

TIME CUBE IS ABOVEGOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RadioAstronomer]

Your CvE symphony post would be perfect here. :-)

[general_re]

Heh - this is sort of a pro forma affair on this thread here, isn't it? ;)

I'm not sure I can dig it up at the moment, but I'll take a look if I get some time. I've been offline for the last week - I missed the thrilling climax of the crevo noir thread :-( - and I'm just this morning cleaning out my email and trying to catch up to whatever I missed on FR.

I check out for a week, and I've got 120 emails in my inbox when I get back. You can run away from the world, but it keeps on turning anyway...

[medved]

TIME CUBE IS ABOVEGOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't know about the time cube, but consider the tally wrt guys who have made claims like that, using the coldest, hardest system of reckoning feasible:

• God: Not provably dead or alive, evidence of works in past ages indisputable.
• Jesus Christ: Provably dead, credible eyewitness reports of being seen after he died, basic message regarding ethics and conduct sufficiently in harmony with the human psyche that his religion yet thrives after 2000 years.
• Chuck Darwin: Provably dead, BS theory demolished, not missed.
• Nietzsche: provably dead, not seen since he died, not missed.
• Karl Marx: Provably dead, philosophy universally despised and rejected after a century of bloodshed caused by it.
• Thomas Malthus: Dead, even his dog and his mama don't miss him.
• Vladimir Lenin: Provably dead, statue destroyed, body used for fertilizer.
• Joe Stalin: Died while leaches were being applied in 1953.
• Adolph Hitler: Provably dead, not seen since.
• Alfonse Capone: Died of syphilis after lengthy stay in federal prison. Not seen, not missed.
• Madelyn Murray O'Hare, other members of O'Hare family: missing, along with $629,500 of Atheism Inc.s money, presumed dead, nobody bothering to search other possibly than for the missing money...

Like I say, I don't really know about the timecube, but aside from that, the scorecard does not appear to favor your side...

[PatrickHenry]

TIME CUBE IS ABOVE GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This begs for a link. TIME CUBE .

[stanz]

Thank you for this exhaustive list of Junior's great comebacks. I will bookmark it and refer to it when I need a good laugh ( or some response to creationist drivel.)

[billbears]

bump for later

[Lurking Libertarian]

God created it all. He just did it in such a way as to not have to constantly tweak His creation.

Exactly.

[medved]

That little rundown was nowhere close to exhaustive, just what I was able to find in the ten minutes of time which I figured it rated. "Junior" in his own mind is waging some sort of a war against forces of darkness which are conspiring to return the world to some sort of a dark age.

[medved]

God created it all. He just did it in such a way as to not have to constantly tweak His creation.

Exactly.

Nonetheless, the creation used to tweak itself on occasion; macroevolution was not a part of the picture. Moreover, the tweaking process has since been shut down, and no longer exists in our present age.

[stanz]

Aw c'mon now. I think Junior's just a little impatient. But,his responses are trying to bring folks into the light not to any dark place.

[sayfer bullets]

Apparently these folks have a high level of ego-involvement in supporting their ideology.

[PatrickHenry]

Self-search ping.

[medved]

Apparently these folks have a high level of ego-involvement in supporting their ideology.

You'd have to. Think about it: how would YOU try to defend something as blindingly stupid as an ideological doctrine (evolutionism) which required an infinite sequence of zero-probability events in order to even get started, I mean, something immeasurably stupider than voodoo, rastifari, or believing in the great pumpkin?

The ONLY way I could think of to do it is precisely what we observe in the evolutionists, i.e. maximum arrogance.

I believe in the great pumpkin and I'm awfully damned proud of it and, buddy, if you DON'T believe in the great pumpkin, you are seriously messed up.

[tortoise]

Think about it: how would YOU try to defend something as blindingly stupid as an ideological doctrine (evolutionism) which required an infinite sequence of zero-probability events in order to even get started, I mean, something immeasurably stupider than voodoo, rastifari, or believing in the great pumpkin?

What kind of moron thinks that evolution requires an "infinite" sequence of "zero probability" events? Replace that with a finite sequence of non-zero probability events and at least you'll be somewhere vaguely in the realm of reality.

[sayfer bullets]

All one has to do is sit back....watch them talk amongst themselves....and it's quite obvious.

However, ...get into an in-depth discussion about the issues central to the debate (assuming you get that far) and you often get :

-"Evolution does not address that"
-swaps and associations such as "science" for "evolution (theory)" that are artfully switched in and out of assertions and arguments "as if" they are one-in-the-same.
-An incredible need of an alternative theory/belief/anything for comparison or deflection.
-"Six degrees to creation theory" game. (much like the Bacon game, but with a sneer. (see above)

It simply is not fair or correct to paint either side with a broad brush. Within each camp there are those who hold legitimately strong and honest opinions. However within each group there also exists the opposite.

I find it interesting the difference between what evo's discuss amongst themselves versus "creationists". If the creationist discusses evolutionists spiritual longevity, or any other aspect of their person, it's certainly not with delight or enjoyment as we see with the other side who derives pleasure out of ridicule.

[sayfer bullets]

That was quite interesting....lol.

[gore3000]

Nonetheless, the creation used to tweak itself on occasion; macroevolution was not a part of the picture. Moreover, the tweaking process has since been shut down, and no longer exists in our present age.

The evos never back up their claims. I have been asking them for months to give me a single example of macro-evolution, they act as if I was speaking Chinese. They know very well their theory is totally phony that's why they do not even try to back it up.